15th August 2007 01:18
Hi
Let me get the not-so-nice opinion out of the way first...

In my opinion, and also the opinion of the vast majority when this topic was mentioned before, live music or a singer is a million times better than a CD in the Church. I would compare it with having a supermarket dinner heated up instead of a proper meal at the reception.....sorry!
I would urge you if at all possible to have live music. Even if you cant get the top quality group/singer you might have wanted, i think even 1 or 2 musicians/singers is way better.
Having said that, of course it can be done. And I hope my strong opinion hasnt offended any of you who did it that way (it was a bit tongue in cheek, Im a musician

).
Music, or live music, mightnt be the most important thing to every bride, and thats fair enough. So suppose you have decided to do it by CD. Heres a few guidelines:
Good idea to have a few different cds as someone suggested. Also perhaps a backup copy of all tracks!
Definitely have 1 person to operate it; it is not that simple a job. You have to select the correct song(!), volume, and the right time in the ceremony. Also if you need to stop it early at, say, the candle lighting for example.
As regards volume, well, someone hit the nail on the head in the post about the person who was volume shy. Really, you nearly want a musician or someone good on sound to operate.
It may be possible to put a microphone to the CD and come through the church system, if there is one.
If not, you dont need to hire a huge PA (in that case you might as well hire musicians). A decent keyboard or guitar amp, again with either a lead to the CD or a microphone, should suffice.
And indeed some stereo systems in a small church might just have enough volume.
Hope these pointers helped; in my humble opinion while you save some money it is an extra fairly important job for someone to do on the day, and you may be better off hiring a group/singer who can take all that stress from you!
Good luck
h